Priors
Precedents

Narmada Bachao Andolan and Sardar Sarovar, 1989-1993

1989 – 30 Mar 1993, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra

The Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), led by Medha Patkar with Baba Amte, opposed the Sardar Sarovar dam over displacement and environmental damage. From 25 December 1990 Patkar led a march from Madhya Pradesh towards the dam site; Gujarat police stopped it at Ferkuwa on the state border, and Patkar and others began a hunger strike there on 7 January 1991. In June 1991 the World Bank commissioned an independent review headed by Bradford Morse, whose June 1992 report found deficiencies in the Bank's appraisal and in the project's implementation; the Government of India and the Government of Gujarat did not accept it. On 29 March 1993 the Government of India asked the World Bank to cancel the rest of its loan and chose to complete the project on its own.

Draft. Written with AI help from the sources listed. Not yet checked by a person. 3 claims are held back until sourced. Report an error

In power
INC: Centre

What the government did

  1. 29 Mar 1993

    OtherCentreShare

    By a letter of 29 March 1993 the Government of India asked the World Bank to cancel the remaining undisbursed portion of its loan for the Sardar Sarovar dam and power project, and decided to complete construction on its own.

    MoreLess · 4 sources

    The World Bank announced the decision on 30 March and put the cancelled amount at about $170 million of a $450 million package approved in 1985. In October 1992 the Bank's Executive Directors had made continued support depend on benchmarks for resettlement and environment, to be met by 31 March 1993. The Bank had commissioned the independent review in June 1991; its President said in June 1992 that the review had identified deficiencies in the Bank's appraisal, in the borrower's implementation and in the Bank's supervision.

    Sources [6][7][8][10]

Outcome

The World Bank formally cancelled the loan and the government continued the project with its own funds. The Supreme Court suspended further construction in 1995. On 18 October 2000 it declined to rely on the Morse report, which neither the World Bank nor the Government of India had accepted, and directed that construction continue as per the Tribunal Award, with the dam raised beyond 90 metres only in step with resettlement.

Background

Who governed at the start of the protest. Each action above counts for the party in power where and when it happened.

Centre government
INC, P. V. Narasimha Rao, Prime Minister
State government
Janata Dal in Gujarat, Chimanbhai Patel, Chief Minister
Places
Narmada valley, Sardar Sarovar dam site, Ferkuwa, Barwani, Dhule
Cause
Displacement and environmental damage from the Sardar Sarovar dam
Organisers
Narmada Bachao Andolan, Medha Patkar, Baba Amte
Scale
A march from Barwani to the Gujarat border from 25 December 1990 to 31 January 1991 (Asia Watch), with about 2,000 Adivasis camped on the Madhya Pradesh side at Ferkuwa (Abhiyan); a hunger strike from 7 January 1991, 22 days long according to the Goldman Prize citation

What they said

Words in quote marks were matched in the source. Everything else is a summary; open the source for the exact words. Each statement says whether the speaker's party was in power or in opposition at the time.

In power

Did not accept the independent review's report, in a letter of 7 August 1992 from the Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forests, according to the Supreme Court. In March 1993 asked the World Bank to cancel the rest of the loan and said it would complete the project on its own; it said significant progress had been made on the resettlement and environment benchmarks and that it remained committed to the action plan.

Summary, not a quote

In power

“The Independent Review report presented in June 1992 was highly disappointing.”

At Section 1, Introduction, p. 1

Sources

  1. 1Medha Patkar, 1992 Goldman Environmental Prize recipientGoldman Environmental PrizeT5 SecondaryArchived 10 May 2026
  2. 2The Dramatic Battle over Narmada: an eyewitness report (Abhiyan cover story, 14 January 1991, in English translation)Abhiyan (translation published by Oral History Narmada), Sheela Bhatt, 14 Jan 1991T4 Report
  3. 3Before the Deluge: Human Rights Abuses at India's Narmada Dam (News from Asia Watch, vol. 4, no. 15)Asia Watch (Human Rights Watch), 17 Jun 1992T5 SecondaryArchived 31 Aug 2003
  4. 4Narmada Bachao Andolan crusader Medha Patkar gains recognition at lastIndia Today, Uday Mahurkar, 15 Dec 1991T4 ReportArchived 16 Jan 2020
  5. 5Sardar Sarovar Project becomes a contentious environmental issue (India Today debate)India Today, 15 Nov 1992T5 SecondaryArchived 7 Dec 2021
  6. 6Indian Government Cancels World Bank Loan for Sardar Sarovar (Narmada) Project (Bank Press Release No. 93/S51)World Bank, 30 Mar 1993T1 Record
  7. 7Project Completion Report: India, Narmada River Development, Gujarat: Sardar Sarovar Dam and Power Project (Report No. 14159), Annexes to Part I and Part IIIWorld Bank, 29 Mar 1995T1 Record
  8. 8World Bank President Acknowledges Problems in India Narmada Projects (Bank News Release No. 92/S66)World Bank, 18 Jun 1992T1 Record
  9. 9Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union Of India And OthersSupreme Court of India (text on Indian Kanoon), 18 Oct 2000T2 CourtArchived 5 Jul 2010
  10. 10"Movements are not like governments that come and go": 34 years of the Narmada protestsThe Caravan, Nikhil Eapen, 14 Oct 2019T5 SecondaryArchived 14 Oct 2019
  11. 11Comments on the Report of the Independent Review on Sardar Sarovar ProjectGovernment of Gujarat (copy published by the International Environmental Law Research Centre), Aug 1992T1 RecordArchived 6 Jun 2007

Similar precedents

Faded actions are ones this precedent does not share.

1994–99Enron Dabhol power project protestsSS: Maharashtra; INC: MaharashtraVillagers of Guhagar taluka in Ratnagiri district, Maharashtra, and activists from across India protested against the Dabhol Power Company plant promoted by Enron, with the largest actions in 1997. The Shiv Sena-BJP state government had suspended the project in August 1995 after a cabinet sub-committee review, then accepted a renegotiated agreement in January 1996 and allowed construction to proceed. Police applied rolling prohibitory orders under Section 37 of the Bombay Police Act from January 1997, arrested several hundred protesters at a time, used lathi charges and tear gas, and district magistrates issued Section 144 orders barring Medha Patkar from Ratnagiri and Raigad districts and B.G. Kolse-Patil from Ratnagiri district. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International documented the response in 1997 and 1999. Commission of inquiryConcessionOther2006–07Kalinganagar police firingBJD: OdishaOn 2 January 2006, police at Kalinganagar in Jajpur district, Orissa (now Odisha), fired on Adivasi villagers who were opposing construction of a boundary wall for a proposed Tata Steel plant on land acquired by the state's industrial development corporation. The state government's count was 12 villagers and one police havildar killed; later reports give 13 or 14 villagers as injured people died. The BJD-BJP state government ordered a judicial inquiry, raised ex gratia payments and transferred the district collector and superintendent of police, while the Bisthapan Virodhi Jan Manch blockaded the Daitari-Paradip highway (NH-200) for about 14 months. Tear gasFiringCurfewOtherConcessionCommission of inquiryBarricadingSection 144 / 1632018Thoothukudi anti-Sterlite protest and police firing, May 2018AIADMK: Tamil Nadu; DMK: Tamil NaduResidents of Thoothukudi (Tuticorin) protested against the expansion of Vedanta's Sterlite Copper smelter. A prohibitory order under Section 144 CrPC was passed on the night of 21 May 2018. On 22 May police opened fire after clashes, and one more person was shot on 23 May; the police said 13 people died and 102 were injured. The Tamil Nadu government suspended internet in three districts, appointed retired High Court judge Aruna Jagadeesan to inquire, and ordered the plant shut on 28 May 2018. The Madurai bench of the Madras High Court later handed the investigation to the CBI. The commission's report, tabled in October 2022, found the firing unprovoked. Section 144 / 163FiringDetentionInternet shutdownCommission of inquiryOther

Entry last updated 15 Oct 2026. Something wrong or missing? Edit content/precedents/narmada-bachao-andolan-1989-1993.yaml