Section 144 / 163
5 Aug 2019
- In power
- BJP — Jammu and Kashmir (President’s Rule)
- Acted
- State government, Jammu and Kashmir
- Under
- Section 144 CrPC (orders by District Magistrates restricting movement and public gatherings, as recorded by the Supreme Court)
District Magistrates imposed restrictions on movement and public gatherings under Section 144 CrPC, as recorded by the Supreme Court. A J&K government statement on the night of 4 August said there would be no movement of public in Srinagar district and all educational institutions would stay closed. PTI, as carried by The Wire, reported that the Srinagar orders banned assembly of more than four people, that similar orders were imposed in Jammu district, and that night curfew was imposed in Kishtwar and Rajouri districts and the Banihal area. The Srinagar district administration posted that restrictions under Section 144 had been imposed and that there were no curfew orders anywhere; The Indian Express reported that residents were not allowed outside their neighbourhoods and that curfew passes were not being issued. Before the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General said individual movement had never been restricted, that restrictions were never imposed in Ladakh, and that they were being relaxed gradually. On 16 August 2019 Chief Secretary BVR Subrahmanyam said no lives had been lost since the restrictions began; AFP reported a family's account that a 62-year-old man died from tear gas fired by security forces (see figures). [3][1][2][5][4][7][8][6]
- none deaths or serious injuries since the restrictions began, as of 16 August 2019, said Chief Secretary BVR Subrahmanyam (press conference, as reported by AP) [7]
- none loss of life or major injury since 5 August 2019, as of 16 August 2019, said Chief Secretary BVR Subrahmanyam (press conference, as reported by The Quint) [8]
- 1 (Sidiq Khan, 62) death alleged to have been caused by tear gas fired by security forces, by 18 August 2019, said his nephew Muddasir Ahmed, to AFP [6]
Draft. Written with AI help from the sources listed. Not yet checked by a person. 1 claim is held back until sourced. Report an error
The same action under other governments
For each party in power, its most recent section 144 / 163 in another entry. Chosen by this rule, not by hand.
- 2026Cockroach Janta Party protests over exam paper leaksIn power: BJP — Delhi Police
- 2018Thoothukudi anti-Sterlite protest and police firing, May 2018In power: AIADMK — Tamil Nadu
- 2012December 2012 Delhi gang-rape protestsIn power: INC — Delhi Police
- 2007Kalinganagar police firingIn power: BJD — Odisha
- 2007Singur and Nandigram land acquisition protestsIn power: CPI(M) — West Bengal
Sources
- 1India imposes Kashmir lockdown, puts leaders 'under house arrest'Al Jazeera, Rifat Fareed, 4 Aug 2019T4 ReportArchived 4 Aug 2019
- 2Article 370 Revoked: J&K Leaders Detained, PM Modi Praises Amit ShahThe Wire, 5 Aug 2019T5 SecondaryArchived 5 Aug 2019
- 3Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (W.P. (C) No. 1031 of 2019)Supreme Court of India (via Indian Kanoon), 10 Jan 2020T2 CourtArchived 11 Jan 2020
- 4Kashmir Valley has seen many a lockdown but why this time it is so differentThe Indian Express, Muzamil Jaleel, Bashaarat Masood, Adil Akhzer, 7 Aug 2019T4 ReportArchived 7 Aug 2019
- 5Restrictions u/s 144 CrPC have been imposed in districts in view of prevailing law & order situation. (post)Srinagar district administration (@srinagaradmin), X, 5 Aug 2019T1 Record
- 6'4,000 detained' in Kashmir since autonomy strippedAFP via Asia Times (AFP copy), Parvaiz Bukhari, 18 Aug 2019T5 SecondaryArchived 22 Oct 2020
- 7Hundreds join street protest in Kashmir, defying restrictionsAP via PBS NewsHour (AP copy), Ashok Sharma, 16 Aug 2019T5 SecondaryArchived 16 Aug 2019
- 8Ground Report: Phone Lines in Kashmir to Be Restored Over WeekendThe Quint, Shadab Moizee, 16 Aug 2019T4 ReportArchived 13 Sep 2019