Section 144 / 163
18 Feb 2016
- In power
- BJP — Haryana
- Acted
- State government, Haryana
- Under
- Section 144 CrPC
District Magistrates issued prohibitory orders under Section 144 CrPC on 18 February in Rohtak (the committee report gives the order as No. 3018-57/MB in one place and No. 4011-51/MB, the number of the internet order, in another), Jind, Hisar and Panipat, according to the Prakash Singh committee. The Indian Express reported on 20 February that Section 144 had been imposed in at least six districts [1][2]
Post on XThe card says this entry is a draft.
Draft. Written with AI help from the sources listed. Not yet checked by a person. 5 claims are held back until sourced. Report an error
The same action under other governments
For each party in power, its most recent section 144 / 163 in another entry. Chosen by this rule, not by hand.
- 2026Cockroach Janta Party protests over exam paper leaksIn power: BJP — Delhi Police
- 2018Thoothukudi anti-Sterlite protest and police firing, May 2018In power: AIADMK — Tamil Nadu
- 2012December 2012 Delhi gang-rape protestsIn power: INC — Delhi Police
- 2007Kalinganagar police firingIn power: BJD — Odisha
- 2007Singur and Nandigram land acquisition protestsIn power: CPI(M) — West Bengal
Sources
- 1Prakash Singh Committee Report on Role of Officers of Civil Administration and Police During the Jat Reservation Agitation (Feb. 7 - 22, 2016), Volume I – Main ReportGovernment of Haryana (Prakash Singh Committee), Prakash Singh, 13 May 2016T2 CourtArchived 14 Jun 2016
- 2Haryana jat quota protest takes violent turn, 3 killed, shoot-at-sight orders in 2 districtsThe Indian Express, Khushboo Sandhu, 20 Feb 2016T4 ReportArchived 20 Feb 2016